Michigan
Gov. Rick Snyder gave the middle finger to gays and lesbians in the state when
he signed a bill on Dec. 22 that yanks domestic partner benefits away from
state employees. That’s three days before Christmas, folks. Snyder Claus has
nothing but lumps of coal for ho ho homos.
There
was no compelling reason for such a bill to even exist - aside from the
Michigan legislature’s long-standing obsession with discriminating against LGBT
people, that is. Ever since the anti-gay marriage amendment passed in 2004,
domestic partner benefits have been in the cross-hairs.
While
some Republicans claim that doing away with the benefits helps save the
cash-strapped state money, the amount of money in question is negligible,
especially for a state that is leaking talented young people like a sieve.
The
move, has, not surprisingly, riled up civil rights organizations and Michigan’s
LGBT groups. Not that Snyder gives a shit.
Emily
Dievendorf, policy director at Equality Michigan, called Snyder’s support for
the bill "appalling" and accused him of caving "to the radical social agenda
coming from the legislature."
"[T]he
Governor told unmarried public employees that they could no longer care for
their partners or children," Dievendorf said. "He has put hardworking gay and
lesbian couples and their children into harm's way by eliminating important
health care coverage. He has spent the last two years talking about creating a
welcoming state with a attractive business climate, and these bills fly in the
face of those goals."
The
Michigan ACLU vowed to fight the law.
"The
decision to take healthcare benefits away from families just in time for the
holidays is mean-spirited and cruel," said Kary Moss, executive director of the
Michigan ACLU. "The bill serves no other purpose than to single out a
small minority of people and deprive them of critical protections as guaranteed
by the U.S. Constitution."
Oddly
enough, Snyder did care about the Michigan Constitution, though only a little,
when he made sure that the state’s universities would be left out of this bill.
He cited the "constitutional autonomy" of universities when he touted their
exclusion. On the surface this might seem like a generous move, but don’t be
fooled.
Public
universities in Michigan were very outspoken against this bill. "The
University of Michigan must be able to offer an excellent benefit package to
our employees and to those we hope to recruit to UM for their unique talents,
skills and expertise," University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman
wrote in a letter sent to legislators. "The loss of our ability to offer
such benefits would put the university, and our state, at a serious
disadvantage compared to peers."
Snyder didn’t
let universities keep domestic partner benefits because he respects the need to
attract the best and the brightest talent and to foster a welcoming and diverse
atmosphere. No, he did it because he didn’t want universities to sue. Because
he knows that he did a really shitty thing, and he made damn sure the public
employees impacted - including but not limited to schools, cities, townships -
didn’t have a gay leg to stand on.
These
people are real. According to Equality Michigan Executive Director Denise
Brogan-Kator, they include Ann Arbor teacher Theresa Bassett's partner and
6-year-old son, Kalamazoo City employee JoLinda Jach’s partner "who suffers
from arthritis and early stages of glaucoma," and state employee Deb Harrah’s
partner "who has diabetes and a thyroid condition."
With a
stroke of a pen, Gov. Snyder told these families, "You don’t matter because
you’re gay." My guess is he didn’t lose any sleep over it.
