Marriage
between same-sex couples has, to say the least, become a complicated social
issue. Mind you, it shouldn’t be complicated. But it’s hard for some folks to
wrap their brains around the idea of a lady wanting to marry another lady or a
dude wanting to marry another dude.
One of
those folks who can’t seem to get a grip on the concept is David Usher of the
Center for Marriage Policy, a group that is anti-gay, to say the least.
But I’ve
got to hand it to him. Usher has come up with one of the batshit craziest gay
marriage conspiracy theories I have ever heard. On Dec. 1, Usher was a guest on
The Janet Mefferd Show, yet another right-wing radio show, where he shared his
theory about where "gay marriage" came from. Naturally, man-hating feminists
are to blame.
"What
happened was back in the late 80s, feminists decided that the only way to fix
the structural problem of the single income family is to make it possible for
any two welfare mothers to marry each other. But they couldn’t come out of the
box saying, ‘Hey we want welfare mothers to be able to marry each other,’
because nobody would buy it, so they had to come up with a game that would
work. And of course feminists being what they are, being really good at coming
up with equality-based arguments that are as phony as a four dollar bill, they
came up with the concept of gay marriage."
Got it?
Feminists, who didn’t want a man because, eww, penises, decided that they would
combine their single parent income power by marrying each other as a big F.U.
to the government, probably in response to never passing the Equal Rights
Amendment. They obviously thought this all the way through recognizing how easy
it would be to gay-marry each other.
Usher is
super serious about this. In a November column on the Center for Marriage
Policy website he claims that feminists "intend to convert marriage into a
feminist-controlled government enterprise and subordinate the rest of America
to fund it."
It’s not
"gay marriage," folks, it’s "feminist marriage." And all the cool ladies are
doing it.
Of
course, you might be thinking to yourself, "Okay, I can understand why lesbians
would want to marry each other, but why would heterosexual women want to cook
up a fake marriage? It all seems so complicated."
Yes. But
so much fun. See, even if you aren’t a lesbian, being married to another woman
doesn’t cramp your style. In fact, according to Usher, feminists are big sluts
who want to get pregnant all the time and have as many kids as possible so the
government and unsuspecting child support paying fools can support them.
Usher
writes, "Feminist marriage will be far more attractive to all women than
heterosexual marriage. Sexual orientation does not matter when two women marry
and become ‘married room-mates.’ They can still have as many boyfriends as they
want, and capture the richest ones for baby-daddies by ‘forgetting’ to use
their invisible forms of birth control. On average, a feminist marriage will
have at least four income sources, two of them tax-free, plus backup welfare
entitlements."
"Mo’
money, mo’ problems," right? I’m kidding. It’s the perfect plan! I just can’t
figure out why more straight women aren’t doing it. I mean, the fact that this
really and truly is not happening on some kind of grand "destroy marriage"
scale is making Usher look kind of foolish. He needs to do a better job getting
the word out.